American Exceptionalism: Quo Vadis?

image_pdfimage_print

In view of the failures of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, which has seen over 2 million cases and more than 115,000 deaths as of this writing, the very idea of American exceptionalism has unraveled. The expected arrival of the pandemic in the USA was met with overwhelming failures. A country with unmatched military and economic power came up with a shortfall of equipment to deal with the crisis, as well as a lack of leadership from the Federal Government, leaving states and hospitals to fend for themselves and even compete with each other. One nurse taking care of a doctor severely ill with COVID-19 stepped out of the ER weeping and cursing: “I felt incredible anger,” she said — at America’s lack of preparation, at shortages of protective equipment, at official dithering that had left the doctor and other medical workers at risk.”1 According to an unofficial list kept by Medscape, at least 145 health care professionals died of Covid-19 in the USA,2 and the pandemic is far from over.

A Brief Overview of American Exceptionalism

In 1630, even before there was a USA, John Winthrop delivered a sermon in which he called the Puritan community, “a city on a hill.” This city upon a hill is a phrase from the parable of Salt and Light in Jesus‘s Sermon on the Mount. In Matthew 5:15, he tells his listeners, “You are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden.”

The reference to this city on a hill was mentioned both by President Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. During an address delivered to the General Court of Massachusetts, President elect Kennedy said: “I have been guided by the standard John Winthrop set before his shipmates on the flagship Arbella three hundred and thirty-one years ago, as they, too, faced the task of building a new government on a perilous frontier. We must always consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill—the eyes of all people are upon us.”4  On the eve of his election in 1980, Ronald Reagan said: “I have quoted John Winthrop’s words more than once on the campaign trail this year—for I believe that Americans in 1980 are every bit as committed to that vision of a shining city on a hill, as were those long-ago settlers.”5

The term American exceptionalism gained considerable traction in the 1950s after World War II, when American historians hotly debated why their country escaped the violent disruptions that occurred in Europe, such as revolutions, dethroning of monarchies, class uprisings, two world wars and genocide over the previous two centuries. Since none of this happened in the US, they attributed it to our exceptional qualities. Historian Joshua Zeitz notes: “They conveniently glossed over the violently repressive regimes of chattel slavery, redemption (the return of white supremacy and the removal of rights for blacks – instead of Reconstruction), war on Indian nations, and Jim Crow, which, of course, most historians writing in these years blithely did.”6

During the colonial period from the 16-20th Century, the world was Eurocentric. The end of World War II saw the rise of an American-dominated world. While European powers in–particular Great Britain and France–had used both their hard and soft power to dominate, colonize, and control the countries of the Far East, Middle East and Africa, the American approach of projecting global power has been different, tailored for a divergent time in history, as a consequence to the end of colonialism in the latter part of the 20th Century.

However, as US power accumulated in many countries including those of South and Central America and the Middle East, a double standard prevailed, supporting dictators and despots who did our bidding, and overthrowing democratically-elected governments that refused to abide by an American dictated economic agenda. Today, most young Americans, perhaps frustrated with the Iraq War and the lengthy engagement in Afghanistan, are less likely to endorse an all-encompassing global role for the USA. Similar views are held by the libertarian senator, Rand Paul. The recent polls showing a lack of interest in the US direct involvement in Syria and in the Ukrainian crisis, as well as Trump’s ‘presumed’ isolationist views, are a fallout of our long engagement in Afghanistan and the Iraq War championed by conservatives and neo-cons.

The 2016 Presidential election saw Trump’s trademark slogans: “Make America Great Again,” and “America First.” Referring to American exceptionalism, he said: “I don’t think it’s a very nice term. I think you’re insulting the world.” That doesn’t necessarily mean that Trump shied away from the exceptional principle. He has replaced it with a different yet familiar tag line that conveys the same sense of national power and entitlement—America First, itself a term that was associated with opponents of the US entering World War II.7

The other single most important feature of American exceptionalism is that at one time, the U.S. was a classless society with considerable upward mobility–or, at least, for white Americans, though it did not apply to African Americans or Native Americans. Furthermore, in view of our capitalist economy–a presumed hallmark of exceptionalism–most Americans were not tempted by socialism, unlike their European counterparts. The fall of Communism, the acceptance of capitalist economies in such socialist countries like Sweden and government-sponsored capitalism in China, the opening up of India to foreign capital,  all implied the ascent and the universal triumph of American capitalism over socialism.

The Exposé of American Exceptionalism: The Coronavirus Pandemic

Perhaps no other event in modern American history unraveled the very idea of American exceptionalism as has the Coronavirus pandemic. Its crushing arrival in the US–despite substantial warning–was met with  failures in organization, lack of materials to handle the crisis, denial, and empty bravado. A country with unmatched hard and soft power failed to come up with enough cotton swabs, N95 masks, gloves, face shields, ventilators, special lab chemicals and enough ICU beds.

What was most distressing was that our paramedical and medical personnel had to work with inadequate protection at the very risk of their own lives despite wartime manufacturing and supply powers assumed by the President. I saw doctors in New York City turned into beggars for ponchos because they couldn’t get proper medical gowns. I have seen fear, anxiety, and trepidation on the faces of doctors and nurses as they surged ahead to care for COVID patients and when they had to keep away from their spouses and children following their shifts. Several dedicated doctors, my friends and colleagues, lived in their apartments in New York City caring for COVID patients while their wives and children stayed for weeks on end with in-laws or relatives away from the city and even left for other states. This was the norm of the day for medical personnel, rather than the exception.

It is deplorable that for effective diagnostic testing of COVID-19, the US was far behind many other countries, such as Germany, New Zealand, and South Korea. Indeed, Maryland’s Republican governor, Larry Hogan, accepted a planeload of 500,000 testing kits from Seoul to make up for the U.S. shortfall. The aid was dubbed Operation Enduring Friendship and annoyed Trump, the “America First” president.9

There is no question that the pandemic has laid bare and ripped apart our patchwork health care system, even though it is the most expensive in the world, accounting for 27% of the Federal Budget. Indeed, in their latest report, The Commonwealth Fund ranked the US last among the most developed countries of Europe including Canada and Australia, whereas we were first in expenditure.8 Undoubtedly, the US possesses high-end health care of exceptional quality that has been the envy of the world; however, the Census Bureau estimated that a total of 27.5 million people in the U.S. were uninsured in 2018. The controversial Affordable Health Care Act, popularly known as “Obamacare,” was on the verge of remedying some of these inadequacies in our health care system; however, the recent Republican administration under Donald J. Trump has ramped up its attack on the Affordable Care Act by backing a federal judge’s decision to declare the entire law unconstitutional without an alternative plan.

The effects of COVID-19 have also exposed striking inequality within our health care system. Current data suggests a disproportionate burden of illness and death among racial and ethnic minorities. In New York, the epicenter of the epidemic in the US, wealthy private hospitals, primarily in Manhattan, were able to increase bed capacity, ramp up testing and acquire protective gear due to their political and financial clout. The Mount Sinai Health System, the institution where I work, was able to get the N95 masks from China delivered by Warren Buffett’s private planes.10 On the other hand, a Brooklyn hospital which is publicly funded and part of SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University tried to raise money for protective gear through a GoFundMe page started by a resident physician. The patients attending the hospital are poor and people of color; furthermore, the hospital gets most of its revenue from Medicare and Medicaid.

The US had advanced warning of the possibility of a pandemic 15 years ago and still wasn’t prepared. “If a pandemic strikes, our country must have a surge capacity in place that will allow us to bring a new vaccine online quickly and manufacture enough to immunize every American against the pandemic strain,” President George W. Bush said in a call for readiness in 2005.11 Nearly 10 years later, President Obama sounded the alarm: “There may and likely will come a time in which we have likely both an airborne disease that is deadly. And in order for us to deal with that effectively, we have to put in place an infrastructure–not just here at home, but globally–that allows us to see it quickly, isolate it quickly, respond to it quickly. So that, if and when a new strain of flu like the Spanish flu crops up five years from now, or a decade from now, we’ve made the investment, and we are further along to be able to catch it. It is a smart investment for us to make.”12  Similarly, Bill Gates warned us of a COVID-19-like pandemic in 2015.13

The Future of American Exceptionalism

American exceptionalism should not be defined or viewed as global political dominance different from Eurocentrism, as if we are superior to the rest of the world, nor should it be a rhetorical political slogan. Although Trump expressed the view that the word ‘exceptional’ is offensive, ‘America First’ implies a degree of arrogance irrespective of right or wrong—the interests of the US come First, rupturing the central pillars of multilateralism. In this regard, Trump’s ‘America First’ more likely implies an isolationist view, a slogan to make his base feel good, even in this, our multipolar world.

In my opinion, American exceptionalism should be viewed as our immense contributions in science and technology in the 20th century to today, which have benefited and uplifted the lives of ordinary people the world over. For example, since its founding by President John F. Kennedy more than five decades ago, the Peace Corps has contributed to solving critical challenges alongside local community leaders in 140 countries. Similarly, the Ford Foundation–and more recently the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation–aim to improve health and reduce poverty and could be considered forms of exceptionalism. And it’s arguable that the American system of free enterprise and venture capitalism has fostered companies with a great positive impact on the modern world.

Most countries acknowledge that the USA is a nation with vast economic and military power, and its leadership role is widely accepted. The world needs America’s global engagement and its stand on human rights by the force of example, not by rhetoric and double standards.

The killing of unarmed African-Americans in liberal as well conservative cities and states–reaching a boiling point with the murder of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police–has gone on far too long without accountability. This violence further exposes the lie of American exceptionalism. Protestors are now taking to the streets in the U.S. and worldwide. One transformational event has intersected with yet another—a once-in-a-century public health crisis overlapping with a nationwide anti-racism movement. As stated previously, these two elements are connected. Health outcomes across the US are linked to race and socioeconomic status, and are strong predictors of life expectancy.

Rather than engage in political slogans, the US needs to realize that the economic and technological command it has on a global scale cannot be sustained with the rise of other economies in Asia and Europe. It needs to pare down the economic divide in our country: the rich getting richer, the middle class getting poorer, and the working class losing jobs to globalization. This divide needs to be addressed, not necessarily by over-taxing the rich, but by the rich and multi-billion dollar corporations paying their fair share in taxes, by creating greater opportunity with afocus on education, by bringing back manufacturing, by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, and by creating new sources of energy to safeguard the planet from climate change. Globalization over the last several decades has shifted the country from a manufacturing to a service economy. Corporations and government officials who lobbied for tax loopholes and higher profits bear significant responsibility for these changes.

Our disorganized health care system has to be addressed seriously, devoid of political underpinnings and patchwork solutions. A bipartisan Task Force inclusive of scientists and health care professionals must be created to deal with future pandemics.

The events of the last few months, the previous Iraq War and its consequences, our lengthy engagement in Afghanistan, gun violence, economic inequality and racism, all beg the questions: 1) Whether American exceptionalism currently conveys the concept originally proposed by Alexis de Tocqueville nearly two centuries ago, and extolled by politicians of both parties; and 2) whether the seeming end of exceptionalism discussed in this article might be a chance for a new awakening, allowing a path forward to a kinder, gentler, and more inclusive America.

References:

  1. Nicholas Kristof, A Young Doctor, Fighting for His Life, The New York Times. May 2, 2020.
  2. In Memoriam: Healthcare Workers Who Have Died of COVID-19. Medscape, May 10, 2020.
  3. de Tocqueville, Alexis.Democracy in America (1840) part 2, p. 36: “The position of the Americans is therefore quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no other democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one.”
  1. Address of President-elect John F. Kennedy delivered to a joint convention of the general court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, January 9, 1961’: https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/massachusetts-general-court-19610109
  2. City Upon A Hill: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_upon_a_Hill
  3. Joshua Zeitz: How Trump is Making Us Rethink American Exceptionalism. Politico, January 07, 2018.
  4. Krishnadev Calamur, A Short History of ‘America First’ January 21, 2017, The Atlantic.
  5. Gomes JA: Health Care in the United States: Current Perspectives, Future Directions. J of Cardiology and Therapeutics, 2015, 3, 64-69.
  6. Calvin Woodward: Coronavirus shakes the conceit of ‘American exceptionalism.’ Federal News Network, April 24, 2020.
  7. One Rich N.Y. Hospital Got Warren Buffett’s Help. This One Got Duct Tape. . New York Times, April 26, 2020. Hospital’s Furious Scramble Across the Globe for Masks.” The New York Times.
  8. Matthew Mosk: George W. Bush in 2005: ‘If we wait for a pandemic to appear, it will be too late to prepare’ ABC News April 5, 2020.
  9. David Mikhelson: Did Obama Urge US Pandemic Preparedness in 2014? Snopes, April 13, 2020.
  10. Paul Rogers: Coronavirus: Bill Gates predicted pandemic in 2015. The Mercury News, March 27, 2020.
Liked it? Take a second to support Wrath-Bearing Tree on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

Anthony Gomes

Dr. Anthony Gomes, MD, FACC, FAHA, is a Professor of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, and The Icahn School of Medicine, New York. He is the author of over 150 scientific articles in Cardiovascular Medicine and in the Humanities. He has also published several books in Cardiovascular Medicine, two books of poetry: Visions from Grymes Hill and Mirrored Reflections, and three novels: The Sting of Peppercorns, Nas Garras do Destino and Have A Heart.

9 Comments
  1. Dr Gomes has provided an illuminating insider’s view of the chaos that the Corona Virus Pandemic created in the health care system of the country, more specifically in the city of NY. The mishandling of the C-19 Pandemic in the USA is the canary in the coal mine for those who are still blissfully unaware where the country has been heading. The siren song of American Exceptionalism has admirably served the purpose of lulling the general US public into a state of benign neglect (and arrogance) about the state of their nation. For starters there is nothing original about the claim of being Exceptional: one is in the company of strange bedfellows – the British (white man’s burden), the French (mission civilizatrice), the Portuguese (missão civilizadora) even Russia of the Bolshevik era (socialist utopia). And let us not even bother to point out that this claim is at odds with the country’s History, the most expansionist power of the last 150 years with only the USSR as its fellow road traveller.
    The fig leaf that covered the Nation’s nakedness has fallen and one is now to witness the unedifying spectacle of the Emperor without clothes. Who took the clothes? Ask the neo liberals, the captains of US industry, the junk bond virtuosos, the financial engineers, the Wall Streeters who, in the name of riches (without creating “real wealth”) stripped the manufacturing base of this Nation, de-industrialised the country, shipped the plants and technology to a salivating, eager China, so that they could be rentiers instead of having to run factories, deal with Unions, live by the labour and environmental laws of the land. There is a saying that in a house where there is no bread, all fight and no one is right. Never let a crisis go to waste. Will the USA use this as a moment for reflection? I truly hope so. But in order for this to happen, there is need for (a) give partisanship a long holiday and (b) bar “lobbyists” from the Capitol. That is a tall order, me thinks.

  2. Thank you for this article. When thinking about the status of American exceptionalism, I can’t help but think our overriding problem as a nation right now is that we are often too limited by past precedent and a general tendency toward stagnation. I don’t see a nationwide level of innovation in government to complement the kind of innovation in technology that our business sector seems to excel at. I think a big part of the challenge is that our constitution kind of hamstrings us, and strict constructionist interpretations of it seem to be holding us back. Thomas Jefferson said that adhering to an unchanged constitution many generations later is like a person later in life attempting to wear an ill-fitting coat long after he/she has outgrown it. It just doesn’t make sense that our constitution would not evolve just as we have evolved demographically as a nation well over 200 years after the founding. I think if we could achieve some level of structural innovation in our mode of government, we would be much better off. That ranges from eliminating the antiquated electoral college to making Congress more representative of large population centers – why does populous California have the same number of senators as sleepy Wyoming? – and many reforms in between. Until we can get out of the straightjacket that is our current constitution, I fear we will trudge through several more years of political stagnation, and of course a waning “exceptionalism.”

  3. I entirely agree with you. A longer essay on the subject addresses the issue you raise regarding our constitution that needs alterations to reflect on our changing world as suggested by Benjamin Franklin centuries ago. Two important changes we need as you pointed out abolition of the electoral college and term limits for congressmen and senators.

  4. Thank You Dr. Gomes! for a very erudite and thoughtful exploration of American ideals and present realities.
    You made good use of your COVID-19 extra time at home!
    Maureen Ribeiro

  5. Thank you for this illuminating article; you have put eloquently into words what I have been thinking for a long time but lack the ability and the depth of knowledge to express.

  6. Dr. Gomes continues to write insightful driving pieces that give us another perspective on our country and thinking. Different from many other writings at this time, he doesn’t end on condemnations or trite expressions. He makes suggestions to alleviate the issues. We can get through this. America should address these issues, fix our healthcare, policing and education systems to be a better place fo bus all.

    Some other thoughts based on Dr. Gomes raising such an interesting point. American exceptionalism is complex. There were times when this country was a beacon for others, even with all the domestic and international frailties of the U.S. The Puritanix drive toward showing that you are elect before God led to people looking to make money to show that they were the chosen. De Tocqueville had noted that even with the egalitarian thinking and no official aristocracy, there was an elite of people who showed off their wealth with their clothes. In the 1830’s he foresaw the designer labels of the 1980’s.

    I keep thinking about Jefferson who was a slave holder and I’ve read had relations with female slaves. He penned the language that set the standard both within the US and worldwide for democratic ideals. Even as a slaveholder he had written of the evils of slavery. In an earlier draft of the Declaration of Independence he had a sentence condemning King George for allowing slavery. It was taken out over his objections.

    1. Thanks Jay for your profound comments. I strongly feel that we need a President who has no affiliation to the two party system for a futuristic America,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Support Wrath-Bearing Tree on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!